'I Would, If Only I Could' How Cities Can Use California’s Housing Element Law to Overcome Neighborhood Resistance to New Housing

57 Willamette Law Review 221-252 (2021)

32 Pages Posted: 22 Jul 2021 Last revised: 5 Aug 2022

See all articles by Christopher S. Elmendorf

Christopher S. Elmendorf

University of California, Davis - School of Law

Eric Biber

University of California, Berkeley - School of Law

Paavo Monkkonen

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)

Moira O'Neill

University of California, Berkeley - Institute for Urban and Regional Development; University of Virginia, School of Architecture

Date Written: July 7, 2021

Abstract

This essay is written for city officials and their allies trying to figure out whether they can use California’s baroque “housing element” planning process to mitigate local barriers to housing supply. Every eight years, cities across the state must adopt a plan, called a housing element, for their share of regionally needed housing. Though it has traditionally been an opaque, consultant-driven process, the housing element update offers real opportunities for overcoming the usual pathologies of municipal land-use politics. First, it provides city councils with an occasion, and a mechanism, to switch from piecemeal policymaking to negotiation of citywide deals on a package of rezoning and constraint-removal reforms. This is so because the “fundamental, mandatory and clear” provisions of a housing element preempt municipal ordinances to the contrary, and because amendments to the housing element must be submitted to the state’s Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for pre-implementation review. Second, the housing element law offers a powerful antidote to status-quo bias: cities that fail to adopt a substantially compliant plan on schedule forfeit the authority to apply their zoning code to affordable housing projects. This gives anti-housing interests an incentive to compromise on the housing element. Third, conscientious city officials can alleviate local barriers to housing supply by improving the flow of information to the state agency that reviews housing elements and certifies them for compliance.

Keywords: Land use, housing, zoning, general plan, comprehensive plan, housing element, fair share, NIMBY, YIMBY, local government, property, local politics, city politics.

Suggested Citation

Elmendorf, Christopher S. and Biber, Eric and Monkkonen, Paavo and O'Neill, Moira, 'I Would, If Only I Could' How Cities Can Use California’s Housing Element Law to Overcome Neighborhood Resistance to New Housing (July 7, 2021). 57 Willamette Law Review 221-252 (2021), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3889771 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3889771

Christopher S. Elmendorf (Contact Author)

University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )

Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
Davis, CA CA 95616-5201
United States
530-752-5756 (Phone)
530-753-5311 (Fax)

Eric Biber

University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )

215 Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States

Paavo Monkkonen

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) ( email )

405 Hilgard Avenue
Box 951361
Los Angeles, CA 90095
United States

Moira O'Neill

University of California, Berkeley - Institute for Urban and Regional Development ( email )

230 Bauer Wurster Hall
#1820
Berkeley, CA 94720
United States

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.law.berkeley.edu/research/clee/about/people/moira-oneill/

University of Virginia, School of Architecture ( email )

Campbell Hall
P.O. Box 400122
Charlottesville, VA 22904
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
151
Abstract Views
949
Rank
350,945
PlumX Metrics