School Food Policy Affects Everyone: Retail Responses to the National School Lunch Program

49 Pages Posted: 18 Aug 2021

See all articles by Jessie Handbury

Jessie Handbury

University of Pennsylvania, The Wharton School

Sarah Moshary

University of California, Berkeley - Marketing Group

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: August 2, 2021

Abstract


We study the private market response to the National School Lunch Program, documenting economically meaningful spillovers to non-recipients. We focus on the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP), an expansion of the lunch program under the 2010 Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act. Under the CEP, participating schools offer free lunch to all students. We leverage both the staggered roll-out and eligibility criterion of the CEP, which is limited to schools where at least 40% of students participate in other means-tested welfare programs. We find that local adoption of CEP leads to a 10% decline in grocery sales at large retail chains. Retailers respond with chain-level price adjustments: chains with the most exposure lower prices by 2.5% across all outlets in the years following adoption, so that the program’s welfare benefits propagate spatially. Using a stylized model of grocery demand, we estimate that by 2016 the indirect benefit had reduced grocery costs for the median household by approximately 4.5%.

Keywords: School Lunch, Spillovers, Uniform Pricing

JEL Classification: H42, I38, L11, R32

Suggested Citation

Handbury, Jessie and Moshary, Sarah, School Food Policy Affects Everyone: Retail Responses to the National School Lunch Program (August 2, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3897936 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3897936

Jessie Handbury

University of Pennsylvania, The Wharton School ( email )

3641 Locust Walk
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States

Sarah Moshary (Contact Author)

University of California, Berkeley - Marketing Group ( email )

Haas School of Business
Berkeley, CA 94720
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
186
Abstract Views
657
Rank
273,384
PlumX Metrics