Do Investors Save When Market Makers Pay? Retail Execution Costs Under Payment for Order Flow Models

51 Pages Posted: 6 Dec 2021

See all articles by Samuel Adams

Samuel Adams

University of Tennessee, Knoxville - Department of Finance

Connor Kasten

University of Tennessee, Knoxville - Department of Finance

Eric K. Kelley

University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Date Written: December 1, 2021

Abstract

We directly compare retail investor execution costs with exchange execution costs. We find off-exchange retail trades execute at lower effective spreads than comparable exchange trades, primarily due to the uninformed nature of retail trades. These results hold when payment for order flow (PFOF) became the main source of trading revenue for brokers, suggesting that these arrangements do not harm retail investors. Additionally, we find that current standards of retail execution quality overstate economic savings and suggest policy changes to represent these more accurately to investors.

Keywords: Zero Commission, Retail Trading, Execution Cost, Microstructure, Stock Trading

JEL Classification: D4, G12, G14, G24, L11

Suggested Citation

Adams, Samuel and Kasten, Connor and Kelley, Eric K., Do Investors Save When Market Makers Pay? Retail Execution Costs Under Payment for Order Flow Models (December 1, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3975667 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3975667

Samuel Adams

University of Tennessee, Knoxville - Department of Finance ( email )

Knoxville, TN 37996
United States

Connor Kasten (Contact Author)

University of Tennessee, Knoxville - Department of Finance ( email )

Knoxville, TN 37996
United States

Eric K. Kelley

University of Tennessee, Knoxville ( email )

916 Volunteer Blvd
Knoxville, TN 37996
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
391
Abstract Views
1,565
Rank
139,918
PlumX Metrics