Challenging Jurors' Racism

61 Pages Posted: 11 Aug 2021 Last revised: 3 Jun 2022

See all articles by Ariana R. Levinson

Ariana R. Levinson

University of Louisville - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law

Sonya Faber

Angelini Pharma

Dana Strauss

University of Ottawa

Sophia Gran-Ruaz

University of Ottawa

Monnica Williams

University of Ottawa - Department of Psychology

Amy Bartlett

University of Ottawa

Maria Macaluso

University of Louisville, Louis D. Brandeis School of Law

Date Written: August 11, 2021

Abstract

Despite overwhelming documentation of disproportionate arrest, prosecution, conviction, and incarceration of Black Americans and the many psychological tools available to assess racism and implicit bias, antiracist jury selection remains an understudied area of research. An evidence-based jury selection process is an urgent need, particularly due to the historical and ongoing racial bias within this process. This article attempts to assist judges and attorneys in their efforts to select an impartial jury by equipping them with a better understanding of different forms of racism (e.g., overt, covert, symbolic, aversive) as well as providing an introduction to insightful psychometric tools that can be used to prioritize the selection of antiracist jurors and identify those who hold implicit and explicit biases or others who are likely to be impartial in their assessment of the case. Attorneys have tended to focus on a person’s race or self-reported attitudes to identify racism in potential jurors, but these approaches do not effectively identify aversive racists, who need to be asked direct questions about their behaviors rather than their attitudes. Likewise, efforts to identify racial justice allies amongst potential jurors should be employed to identify people who are able to approach their jury duty in a courageous anti-racist manner. Some tools discussed include the Color-Blind Racial Attitudes Scale (CoBRAS), Symbolic Racism Scale 2000 (SR2K), Modern Racism Scale (MRS), Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (MEIM), Black-White Implicit Association Test (BW-IAT), and the Interpersonal Racial Allyship Scale (IRAS). We also propose a novel questionnaire created by the authors that is specifically designed to differentiate racial justice allies from aversive racists. We hope this article will help to inform the development of a more robust system to select antiracist jurors, and ultimately help to create a more just American legal system.

Keywords: jury selection, challenge, peremptory, voir dire, questionnaire, racism, implicit, implied, antiracist, aversive, allies

Suggested Citation

Levinson, Ariana R. and Faber, Sonya and Strauss, Dana and Gran-Ruaz, Sophia and Williams, Monnica and Bartlett, Amy and Macaluso, Maria, Challenging Jurors' Racism (August 11, 2021). Gonzaga Law Review, Forthcoming, University of Louisville School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series 2022-2, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3903327

Ariana R. Levinson (Contact Author)

University of Louisville - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law ( email )

Wilson W. Wyatt Hall
Louisville, KY 40292
United States

Sonya Faber

Angelini Pharma ( email )

Dana Strauss

University of Ottawa ( email )

Ottawa
Canada

Sophia Gran-Ruaz

University of Ottawa ( email )

Ottawa
Canada

Monnica Williams

University of Ottawa - Department of Psychology ( email )

Canada

Amy Bartlett

University of Ottawa ( email )

Ottawa
Canada

Maria Macaluso

University of Louisville, Louis D. Brandeis School of Law ( email )

Wilson W. Wyatt Hall
Louisville, KY 40292
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
335
Abstract Views
1,404
Rank
165,907
PlumX Metrics