Principle of ‘Substitutability’ Versus ‘Common Parlance’ Test: Ascertaining Classification of Goods

(2019) 60 Goods and Service Tax Reports (Journal) 1-7

7 Pages Posted: 17 Feb 2019 Last revised: 22 Apr 2022

Date Written: January 28, 2019

Abstract

In a recent decision the European Court of Justice (‘ECJ’) has examined the claim of a taxpayer alleging discriminatory and unfair classification by the tax authorities even though similarly placed goods were classified differently with a resultant lower tax-incidence.

In this decision the ECJ has delineated the applicable tests for classification of similarly-placed goods which for want of better expression are collectively addressed as the “principle of substitutability” in this article.

In the background of the ECJ’s observations, this article examines the legal position applicable in India to determine similar disputes and traces the legal standard applicable in India i.e. the “common parlance” test.

Overall, an attempt is made to contradistinguish the legal position between the European and Indian jurisprudence.

Keywords: Classification, VAT, Substituability of Goods, Common Parlance Principle

JEL Classification: H25, K34

Suggested Citation

Jain, Tarun, Principle of ‘Substitutability’ Versus ‘Common Parlance’ Test: Ascertaining Classification of Goods (January 28, 2019). (2019) 60 Goods and Service Tax Reports (Journal) 1-7, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3329844

Tarun Jain (Contact Author)

Supreme Court of India ( email )

New Delhi
India

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
15
Abstract Views
421
PlumX Metrics