Enriching a Theory of Wage and Promotion Dynamics Inside Firms

43 Pages Posted: 13 Jul 2003

See all articles by Robert S. Gibbons

Robert S. Gibbons

Massachusetts Institute of Technology - Sloan School and Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Michael Waldman

Cornell University - Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: June 2003

Abstract

In previous work we showed that a model that integrates job assignment, human-capital acquisition, and learning can explain several empirical findings concerning wage and promotion dynamics inside firms. In this paper we extend that model in two ways. First, we incorporate schooling into the model and derive a number of testable implications that we then compare with the available empirical evidence. Second, and more important, we show that introducing "task-specific" human capital allows us to produce cohort effects (i.e., the finding that a cohort that enters a firm at a low wage will continue to earn below-average wages years later). We argue that task-specific human capital is a realistic concept and may have many important implications. We also discuss limitations of our (extended) approach.

Keywords: Wage Dynamics, Promotion Dynamics, Human Capital

Suggested Citation

Gibbons, Robert S. and Waldman, Michael, Enriching a Theory of Wage and Promotion Dynamics Inside Firms (June 2003). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=423260 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.423260

Robert S. Gibbons (Contact Author)

Massachusetts Institute of Technology - Sloan School and Department of Economics ( email )

E52-432
MIT
Cambridge, MA 02142
United States
617-253-0283 (Phone)
617-258-6855 (Fax)

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Michael Waldman

Cornell University - Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management ( email )

Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
607-255-8631 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
599
Abstract Views
6,692
Rank
73,981
PlumX Metrics