Do Tax-Based Proprietary Costs Discourage Public Listing?

70 Pages Posted: 13 Apr 2021 Last revised: 10 Oct 2022

See all articles by Benjamin Yost

Benjamin Yost

Boston College - Carroll School of Management

Date Written: October 10, 2022

Abstract

This study investigates whether tax-based proprietary costs associated with being a public firm (i.e., costs resulting from increased visibility to the tax authority) discourage public listing. I exploit the introduction of a mandatory disclosure requirement (FIN 48) which generated a signal to the government regarding the uncertainty of public firms’ tax positions, allowing for more carefully targeted audits. I hypothesize and find evidence of an increased propensity to go private by public, tax aggressive firms following the enactment of the disclosure rule but prior to its adoption. Cross-sectionally, the effect is stronger among firms that are more sensitive to tax-based proprietary costs. Moreover, IPOs by tax aggressive firms exhibit a relative decline after FIN 48, consistent with the disclosure requirement deterring private, tax aggressive firms from going public. Overall, my findings suggest that mandatory disclosure rules imposing tax-based proprietary costs may discourage some firms from operating as public entities.

Keywords: IRS, proprietary costs, public ownership structure, IPO, FIN 48, Schedule UTP

JEL Classification: G24, G32, G34, G38, H25, H26

Suggested Citation

Yost, Benjamin, Do Tax-Based Proprietary Costs Discourage Public Listing? (October 10, 2022). Journal of Accounting & Economics (JAE), Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3825144 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3825144

Benjamin Yost (Contact Author)

Boston College - Carroll School of Management ( email )

140 Commonwealth Avenue
Chestnut Hill, MA 02467
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
248
Abstract Views
1,071
Rank
224,294
PlumX Metrics