Mutual Fund Disagreement and Firm Value: Passive vs. Active Voice

85 Pages Posted: 23 Aug 2021 Last revised: 14 Nov 2022

See all articles by Jan Bena

Jan Bena

University of British Columbia - Sauder School of Business

Iris Wang

University of British Columbia (UBC) - Sauder School of Business

Date Written: August 19, 2021

Abstract

We develop a novel measure of disagreement in voice between active and passive mutual funds using their proxy votes that captures shareholder conflicts in public firms. We show that the disagreement in voice between passive and active mutual funds destroys firm value and suggest that the firm value loss is due to conflicting incentives between the two groups of mutual funds. Using Federal Open Market Committee announcements with press conferences as events that create scope for investors to make informed votes and interpret news differently for individual firms, we show that such value-destroying effect of disagreement is likely causal.

Keywords: Corporate governance, Voting, Disagreement

JEL Classification: G14, G23, G34

Suggested Citation

Bena, Jan and Wang, Iris, Mutual Fund Disagreement and Firm Value: Passive vs. Active Voice (August 19, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3908230 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3908230

Jan Bena (Contact Author)

University of British Columbia - Sauder School of Business ( email )

2053 Main Mall
Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2
Canada
+1 604 822 8490 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.janbena.com

Iris Wang

University of British Columbia (UBC) - Sauder School of Business ( email )

2053 Main Mall
Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2
Canada

HOME PAGE: http://iriswang.ca

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
266
Abstract Views
1,179
Rank
210,819
PlumX Metrics