A Sentencing System for the 21st Century?
60 Pages Posted: 7 Feb 2005
Abstract
The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 created the United States Sentencing Commission and directed it to devise sentencing guidelines for the federal criminal justice system. The Commission recently fulfilled this mandate, promulgating a final set of rules, which took effect November 1. Commissioner Robinson, in filing the lone dissent to these guidelines, argued that they neither meet the expectations of the Act nor provide a comprehensive and workable system.
In this Article, Commissioner Robinson discusses the necessary components of a modern, principled, and workable system. He first identifies an ideal system by describing its primary goals and by offering the drafting principles necessary to create it. Next, he offers additional drafting principles designed to construct a workable system toward the ideal and to encourage the system's consistent application and continuing refinement. Finally, Commissioner Robinson illustrates the central features of a comprehensive sentencing plan that embodies the suggested drafting principles.
Keywords: Sentencing Reform Act, sentencing, United States Sentencing Commission
JEL Classification: K14
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The War within the War on Crime: The Congressional Assault on Judicial Sentencing Discretion
-
The Sentencing Theory Debate: Convergence in Outcomes, Divergence in Reasoning
By Malcolm Thorburn and Allan Manson
-
Appellate Review of Sentencing Policy Decisions after Kimbrough
-
Determining ‘Reasonableness’ Without a Reason? Federal Appellate Review Post-Rita v. United States
-
'If it Suffices to Accuse': United States V. Watts and the Reassessment of Acquittals
-
Judicial Nullification of Juries: Use of Acquitted Conduct at Sentencing
By Eang L. Ngov