Causal Ambiguity, Operating Complexity and Strong Capability-Based Advantages

42 Pages Posted: 29 Apr 2004

See all articles by Michael D. Ryall

Michael D. Ryall

University of Toronto - Rotman School of Management

Date Written: April 7, 2005

Abstract

The presumed connection between causal ambiguity and sustained, capabilities-based performance advantages is well-known to strategy researchers. This paper presents the first formal examination of this connection. I provide a precise distinction between the intrinsic, or potential, level of causal ambiguity associated with a particular strategy and the actual level that obtains in equilibrium. I find that intrinsic ambiguity is a necessary but, contrary to the speculation of some, insufficient condition for a sustained capability-based advantage. Most importantly, I also find that the complexity of the network of causal relations induced by a firm's strategy is not positively correlated with its intrinsic level of ambiguity. This contradicts earlier conjectures that have found their way into mainstream thinking.

Keywords: Causal, ambiguity, complexity, strategy, firm, performance

JEL Classification: D21, D43, D81, L10, L13, L23

Suggested Citation

Ryall, Michael D., Causal Ambiguity, Operating Complexity and Strong Capability-Based Advantages (April 7, 2005). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=537323 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.537323

Michael D. Ryall (Contact Author)

University of Toronto - Rotman School of Management ( email )

105 St. George Street
Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E6 M5S1S4
Canada