Monitoring a Common Agent: Implications for Financial Contracting
46 Pages Posted: 2 Sep 2005
Date Written: August 2005
Abstract
We study the problem of multiple principals who want to obtain income from a privately informed agent and design their contracts non-cooperatively. Our analysis reveals that the degree of coordination between principals has strong implications for the shapes of contracts and the amount of monitoring. Equity-like contracts and excessive monitoring emerge when principals are able to coordinate monitoring or verify each others' monitoring efforts. When this is not possible, free riding in monitoring weakens the incentive to monitor, so that flat payments, debt-like contracts and very low levels of monitoring appear. Free riding may be so strong that there may even be less monitoring than if the principals cooperated with each other, which shows that non-cooperative monitoring does not necessarily lead to excessive monitoring.
Keywords: monitoring, common agency, costly state verification
JEL Classification: D2, D8, G2, G3
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Revelation and Delegation Principles in Common Agency Games
By David Martimort and Lars Stole
-
Contractual Externalities and Common Agency Equilibria
By David Martimort and Lars Stole
-
Strategic Tax Competition; Implications of National Ownership
By Trond E. Olsen and Petter Osmundsen
-
Multiple Lending and Constrained Efficiency in the Credit Market
By Andrea Attar, Eloisa Campioni, ...
-
Truthful Revelation Mechanisms for Simultaneous Common Agency Games
-
By Fahad Khalil, David Martimort, ...
-
Common Agency Equilibria with Discrete Mechanisms and Discrete Types
By David Martimort and Lars Stole