The Reporter's Rejoinder

15 Pages Posted: 30 Nov 2005

Abstract

The word "rejoinder" connotes a reply to criticism, and that connotation sets the scope of this short essay. This Rejoinder will leave aside (albeit with thanks) the articles that explain the background to, the context for, or particular aspects of the Uniform Limited Partnership Act (2001). Instead, this Rejoinder will focus on the three articles that purport to find a blemish (Professor Bishop), a general theoretical deficiency (Mr. Callison and Dean Vestal), or a fundamental misconception (Professor Ribstein) in the new Act.

Keywords: Uniform Limited Partnership Act

Suggested Citation

Kleinberger, Daniel S., The Reporter's Rejoinder. Suffolk University Law Review, Vol. 37, p. 981, 2004, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=862785

Daniel S. Kleinberger (Contact Author)

William Mitchell College of Law ( email )

875 Summit Ave
St. Paul, MN 55105-3076
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
54
Abstract Views
892
Rank
675,887
PlumX Metrics