The Reporter's Rejoinder
15 Pages Posted: 30 Nov 2005
Abstract
The word "rejoinder" connotes a reply to criticism, and that connotation sets the scope of this short essay. This Rejoinder will leave aside (albeit with thanks) the articles that explain the background to, the context for, or particular aspects of the Uniform Limited Partnership Act (2001). Instead, this Rejoinder will focus on the three articles that purport to find a blemish (Professor Bishop), a general theoretical deficiency (Mr. Callison and Dean Vestal), or a fundamental misconception (Professor Ribstein) in the new Act.
Keywords: Uniform Limited Partnership Act
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Kleinberger, Daniel S., The Reporter's Rejoinder. Suffolk University Law Review, Vol. 37, p. 981, 2004, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=862785
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.