When a Plurality is Good Enough

12 Pages Posted: 17 Feb 2006

Abstract

This paper investigates when a runoff election is desirable and when a plurality result is good enough. A runoff election increases the likelihood that the Condorcet winner will be elected but also entails additional costs. The metric for determining whether a runoff election is desirable will be the probability that the winner of the plurality election would win an ensuing runoff. Models of voter behavior are developed that estimate this probability, which are verified with runoff-election data from United States elections. The models allow governments to make more informed choices in creating rules to decide when to hold runoff elections.

Keywords: plurality voting, runoff election, mathematical modelling

JEL Classification: C10, C40, D70

Suggested Citation

O'Neill, Jeffrey C., When a Plurality is Good Enough. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=883104 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.883104

Jeffrey C. O'Neill (Contact Author)

OpenSTV ( email )

59A Magnolia St
Boston, 02474
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.openstv.org

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
90
Abstract Views
829
Rank
516,890
PlumX Metrics