Why People Choose Negative Expected Return Assets - an Empirical Examination of a Utility Theoretic Explanation
22 Pages Posted: 23 Mar 2006
Date Written: March 15, 2006
Abstract
Using a theoretical extension of the Friedman and Savage (1948) utility function developed in Bhattacharyya (2003), we predict that for financial assets with negative expected returns, expected return will be a declining and convex function of skewness. Using a sample of U.S. state lottery games, we find that our theoretical conclusions are supported by the data. Our results have external validity as they also hold for an alternative and more aggregated sample of lottery game data.
Keywords: Lotteries, Skewness, Negative Expected Return Assets
JEL Classification: D80, D81, G10, G12
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Why are British Premium Bonds so Successful? The Effect of Saving With a Thrill
By Sebastian Lobe and Alexander Hölzl
-
Preferences Toward Risk and Asset Prices: Evidence from Russian Lottery Bonds
By Andrey Ukhov
-
Using Financial Innovation to Support Savers: From Coercion to Excitement
By Peter Tufano and Daniel Schneider
-
Making Savers Winners: An Overview of Prize-Linked Savings Products
By Melissa S. Kearney, Peter Tufano, ...
-
Making Savers Winners: An Overview of Prize-Linked Saving Products
By Melissa S. Kearney, Peter Tufano, ...
-
Tax Arbitrage with Risk and Effort Aversion - Swedish Lottery Bonds 1970-1990
-
Tax Arbitrage with Risk and Effort Aversion -- Swedish Lottery Bonds 1970-1990
-
Tax Arbitrage with Risk and Effort Aversion Swedish Lottery Bonds 1970-1990
-
Consumer Demand for Prize-Linked Savings: A Preliminary Analysis
By Nick Maynard, Jan‐emmanuel De Neve, ...