Maccrate (In)Action: The Case for Enhancing the Upper-Level Writing Requirement in Law Schools

41 Pages Posted: 27 Mar 2006

See all articles by Kenneth D. Chestek

Kenneth D. Chestek

University of Wyoming College of Law

Date Written: March 20, 2006

Abstract

In 2001, the American Bar Association amended the Standards for Accreditation of Law Schools to require, for the first time, a "rigorous writing experience after the first year." During the summer of 2004 the author conducted a nationwide survey to determine how law schools responded to this change. The author found that most schools did little more than to require students to take at least one course which was evaluated by means of an academic paper rather than an examination. The author concludes that this is probably not the response the ABA had hoped for, but suggests that a 2005 amendment to the Standards, which now require "writing in a legal context", holds more promise for encouraging law schools to focus more on practical legal writing skills.

Keywords: Legal writing, upper-level writing requirement, ABA accreditation standards

JEL Classification: K40, K10

Suggested Citation

Chestek, Kenneth D., Maccrate (In)Action: The Case for Enhancing the Upper-Level Writing Requirement in Law Schools (March 20, 2006). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=892447 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.892447

Kenneth D. Chestek (Contact Author)

University of Wyoming College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 3035
Laramie, WY 82071
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.uwyo.edu/law/directory/kenneth-chestek.html

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
193
Abstract Views
911
Rank
286,092
PlumX Metrics