Expected Utility and Mean-Risk Asset Pricing Models

15 Pages Posted: 3 Aug 2006

Date Written: May 1, 2006

Abstract

Many people find the mean-variance assumption of the CAPM hard to justify. This paper replaces the mean-variance assumption with a weaker assumption based on the class of consistent risk measures. This class of risk measures is chosen because there is a weak form of equivalence between the mean consistent risk and the expected utility approaches to portfolio optimization. The general form for mean-consistent risk asset pricing models is derived, and the generalized mean-risk beta provided. The CAPM and a number of other well-known mean-risk asset pricing models arise as special cases.

Keywords: CAPM, Asset pricing, Mean-risk, Expected utility, Semivariance

JEL Classification: G11, G12, G14

Suggested Citation

Bornholt, Graham N., Expected Utility and Mean-Risk Asset Pricing Models (May 1, 2006). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=921323 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.921323

Graham N. Bornholt (Contact Author)

Griffith University ( email )

Gold Coast Campus
Gold Coast QLD, 4222
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
432
Abstract Views
2,740
Rank
124,808
PlumX Metrics