A Note on the Risk Behavior and Death of Homo Economicus
Goetborg University Economics Working Paper No. 221
11 Pages Posted: 13 Sep 2006
Date Written: August 2006
Abstract
Recent papers by Cox and Sadiraj (2006) and Rubinstein (2006) have pointed out that expected utility theory is more general than has sometimes been acknowledged, and can hence not be refuted as easily by means of experiments. While acknowledging this fact, this note nevertheless demonstrates that typical risk experimental results appear impossible to reconcile with conventional consumption theory, where people are time consistent and integrate all sources of income perfectly.
Keywords: The Rabin Critique, expected utility of income, expected utility of final wealth
JEL Classification: D81, D91
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Instinctive and Cognitive Reasoning: A Study of Response Times
-
Small- and Large-Stakes Risk Aversion: Implications of Concavity Calibration for Decision Theory
By James C. Cox and Vjollca Sadiraj
-
Measuring Intertemporal Preferences Using Response Times
By Christopher F. Chabris, David Laibson, ...
-
Fast or Fair? A Study of Response Times
By Marco Piovesan and Erik Wengström
-
Strategic Choice of Preferences: The Persona Model
By David Wolpert, Julian C. Jamison, ...
-
Response Time Under Monetary Incentives: The Ultimatum Game
By Pablo Brañas-garza, Ana Leon-mejia, ...
-
Schelling Formalized: Strategic Choices of Non-Rational Personas