Estimating Default Barriers from Market Information

Quantitative Finance, Vol 9. No. 2, pp. 187-196, 2009

25 Pages Posted: 7 Nov 2006 Last revised: 7 May 2009

See all articles by Hoi Ying Wong

Hoi Ying Wong

The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) - Department of Statistics

Tzs Wang Choi

Citic Kawah Bank

Date Written: April 1, 2004

Abstract

Brockman and Turtle (2003) develop a barrier option framework to show that default barriers are significantly positive. Most implied barriers are typically larger than the book value of corporate liabilities. We show theoretically and empirically that this result is biased due to the approximation of the market value of corporate assets by the sum of the market value of equity and the book value of liabilities. This approximation leads to a significant overestimation of the default barrier. To get rid of this bias, we propose a maximum likelihood (ML) estimation approach to estimate the asset values, asset volatilities, and default barriers. The proposed framework is applied to empirically examine the default barriers of a large sample of industrial firms. This paper documents that default barriers are positive but not very significant. In our sample, most of the estimated barriers are lower than the book values of corporate liabilities. In addition to the problem with the default barriers, we find significant biases on the estimation of asset value and asset volatility by Brockman and Turtle (2003).

Keywords: Default barrier, Bankruptcy prediction, Maximum likelihood estimation

JEL Classification: G12, G33

Suggested Citation

Wong, Hoi Ying and Choi, Tzs Wang, Estimating Default Barriers from Market Information (April 1, 2004). Quantitative Finance, Vol 9. No. 2, pp. 187-196, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=942490

Hoi Ying Wong (Contact Author)

The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) - Department of Statistics ( email )

Shatin, N.T.
Hong Kong

Tzs Wang Choi

Citic Kawah Bank ( email )

Shatin, N.T.
Hong Kong

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
287
Abstract Views
3,353
Rank
193,678
PlumX Metrics