Reconciliation and the Fiscal Constitution: The Anatomy of the 1995-96 Budget 'Train Wreck'

35 Pages Posted: 29 Apr 2007

Abstract

Congress originally conceived of the budget reconciliation process as a minor fallback mechanism for bringing one year's tax and spending policy in line with overall budget targets. Reconciliation has since become central to congressional efforts to reduce the federal budget deficit. This Note argues, however, that reconciliation is limited in its capacity to impel significant budgetary reform. The author demonstrates how, in 1995-96, reconciliation caused repeated breakdowns in governmental budget-making, undermining the entire budget process. The author concludes that the legal, institutional, and political constraints inherent in the reconciliation process will continue to constitute powerful obstacles to congressional efforts to implement sweeping national reform via the annual budget.

Suggested Citation

Krishnakumar, Anita S., Reconciliation and the Fiscal Constitution: The Anatomy of the 1995-96 Budget 'Train Wreck'. St. John's Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-0070, Harvard Journal on Legislation, Vol. 35, p. 589, 1998, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=983130

Anita S. Krishnakumar (Contact Author)

Georgetown University Law Center ( email )

600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
115
Abstract Views
1,972
Rank
436,579
PlumX Metrics