Time to Deliberate: Factors Influencing the Duration of Jury Deliberation
28 Pages Posted: 26 Jun 2007
Date Written: June 24, 2007
Abstract
The sixth amendment to the U.S. Constitution stipulates that individuals accused of violating the law by the state must be allowed a speedy and impartial trial by a set of jurors drawn from the community in which the alleged violation of the law took place. Most empirical research on the determinants of the time it takes a jury to render a verdict relies on data from the activities of mock juries. In this paper we analyze a unique and informative dataset on actual juries that mitigates the causal inference issues arising from the study of time to decision of mock juries. The empirical results indicate that 6 person juries are no quicker than 12 person juries; as cases become more complex and/or more severe, juries deliberate longer; non-unanimous decisions take longer to reach than unanimous ones; panels that saw many potential jurors excused during voir dire end up deliberating longer than panels with fewer challenges.
Keywords: Juries, decision making, length of deliberation, hazard models
JEL Classification: K00, D71, D73, D78
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Labor Supply Response to the Earned Income Tax Credit
By Nada Eissa and Jeffrey B. Liebman
-
Welfare, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and the Labor Supply of Single Mothers
By Bruce D. Meyer and Dan T. Rosenbaum
-
By V. Joseph Hotz and John Karl Scholz
-
The Earned Income Tax Credit and the Labor Supply of Married Couples
-
Financial Incentives for Increasing Work and Income Among Low-Income Families
By Rebecca M. Blank, David Card, ...
-
Making Single Mothers Work: Recent Tax and Welfare Policy and its Effects
By Bruce D. Meyer and Dan T. Rosenbaum