A Proposal to Adopt Formulary Apportionment for Corporate Income Taxation: The Hamilton Project
56 Pages Posted: 25 Jun 2007
Date Written: April 2007
Abstract
The current system of taxing the income of multinational firms in the United States is flawed across multiple dimensions. The system provides an artificial tax incentive to earn income in low-tax countries, rewards aggressive tax planning, and is not compatible with any common metrics of efficiency. The U.S. system is also notoriously complex; observers are nearly unanimous in lamenting the heavy compliance burdens and the impracticality of coherent enforcement. Further, despite a corporate tax rate one standard deviation above that of other OECD countries, the U.S. corporate tax system raises relatively little revenue, due in part to the shifting of income outside the U.S. tax base.
In this proposal, we advocate moving to a system of formulary apportionment for taxing the corporate income of multinational firms. Under our proposal, the U.S. tax base for multinational corporations would be calculated based on a fraction of their worldwide income. This fraction would simply be the share of their worldwide sales that occur in the United States. This system is similar to the current method that U.S. states use to allocate national income across states. The state system arose due to the widespread belief that it was impractical to account separately for what income is earned in each state when states are highly integrated economically. Similarly, in an increasingly global world economy, it is difficult to assign profits to individual countries, and attempts to do so are fraught with opportunities for tax avoidance.
Under our proposed formulary apportionment system, firms would no longer have an artificial tax incentive to shift income to low-tax locations. This would help protect the U.S. tax base while reducing the distortionary features of the current tax system. In addition, the complexity and administrative burden of the system would be reduced. The proposed system would be both better suited to an integrated world economy and more compatible with the tax policy goals of efficiency, equity, and simplicity.
Keywords: transfer pricing, formulary apportionment
JEL Classification: H25, H26
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Coveting Thy Neighbor's Manuafacturing: The Dilemma of State Income Apportionment
By Austan Goolsbee and Edward L. Maydew
-
Coveting Thy Neighbor's Manuafacturing: the Dilemma of State Income Apportionment
By Austan Goolsbee and Edward L. Maydew
-
An Examination of Multijurisdictional Corporate Income Taxes Under Formula Apportionment
By Roger H. Gordon and John D. Wilson
-
Formula Apportionment and Transfer Pricing Under Oligopolistic Competition
By Soren Bo Nielsen, Pascalis Raimondos, ...
-
Profit Tax Competition and Formula Apportionment
By Rudiger Pethig and Andreas Wagener
-
Tax Spillovers Under Separate Accounting and Formula Apportionment
By Soren Bo Nielsen, Pascalis Raimondos, ...
-
Corporate Tax Systems, Multinational Enterprises, and Economic Integration
By Guttorm Schjelderup, Hans Jarle Kind, ...
-
The Disappearing State Corporate Income Tax
By Gary C. Cornia, Kelly D. Edmiston, ...
-
Competitive, Political, and Economic Factors Influencing State Tax Policy Changes
-
The Effect of State Income Tax Apportionment and Tax Incentives on New Capital Expenditures
By Sanjay Gupta and Mary Ann Hofmann