Affirmative Action and University Fit: Evidence from Proposition 209

39 Pages Posted: 17 Nov 2012

See all articles by Peter Arcidiacono

Peter Arcidiacono

Duke University - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Esteban M. Aucejo

London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE)

Patrick Coate

Duke University

V. Joseph Hotz

Duke University; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); IZA Institute of Labor Economics

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Abstract

Proposition 209 banned using racial preferences in admissions at California's public colleges. We analyze unique data for all applicants and enrollees within the University of California (UC) system before and after Prop 209. After Prop 209, graduation rates of minorities increased by 4.4%. We characterize conditions required for better matching of students to campuses to account for this increase. We find that Prop 209 did improve matching and this improvement was important for the graduation gains experienced by less-prepared students. At the same time, better matching only explains about 20% of the overall graduation rate increase. Changes after Prop 209 in the selectivity of enrolled students explains 34-50% of the increase. Finally, it appears UC campuses responded to Prop 209 by doing more to help retain and graduate its students, which explains between 30-46% of the post-Prop 209 improvement in the graduation rate of minorities.

Keywords: affirmative action, college enrollment, college graduation, mismatch

JEL Classification: I23, J15

Suggested Citation

Arcidiacono, Peter and Aucejo, Esteban M. and Coate, Patrick and Hotz, V. Joseph, Affirmative Action and University Fit: Evidence from Proposition 209. IZA Discussion Paper No. 7000, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2177198 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2177198

Peter Arcidiacono (Contact Author)

Duke University - Department of Economics ( email )

213 Social Sciences Building
Box 90097
Durham, NC 27708-0204
United States

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) ( email )

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Esteban M. Aucejo

London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE) ( email )

Houghton Street
London, WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom

Patrick Coate

Duke University ( email )

100 Fuqua Drive
Durham, NC 27708-0204
United States

V. Joseph Hotz

Duke University ( email )

213 Social Sciences Building
Box 90097
Durham, NC 27708
United States
919-660-1841 (Phone)
919-684-8974 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.econ.duke.edu/~vjh3

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

IZA Institute of Labor Economics ( email )

P.O. Box 7240
Bonn, D-53072
Germany

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
37
Abstract Views
618
PlumX Metrics