A Comparison of the Stability and Efficiency of the Canadian and American Banking Systems 1870-1925
41 Pages Posted: 8 Mar 2000 Last revised: 10 Mar 2023
Date Written: November 1996
Abstract
In this paper we compare the performance of the U.S. and Canadian banking systems from 1870-1925 in terms of stability and efficiency. In an earlier study we found that the Canadian banking system, based on nationwide branch banking, dominated the U.S. system, based on unit banking, on both criteria in the period 1920-1980. In this study we find that there is little significant difference between the two systems in the preceding 50 years. The difference between the two periods we attribute to the merger movement in Canada after 1900 which allowed the Canadian banking system to evolve from a system with incomplete regional diversification, and hence subject to a significant risk of an occasional failure by a large bank, to one characterized by national diversification and greater stability. The greater stability in turn allowed the financial structure of the banking system to evolve in a more efficient direction.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Contagion and Bank Failures During the Great Depression: The June 1932 Chicago Banking Panic
-
Banking Panics and the Origin of Central Banking
By Gary B. Gorton and Lixin Huang
-
Contagious Bank Runs: Evidence from the 1929-1933 Period
By Anthony Saunders and Barry Wilson
-
By Michael D. Bordo, Hugh Rockoff, ...
-
Why Did the Bank of Canada Emerge in 1935?
By Michael D. Bordo and Angela Redish
-
The Transparency of the Banking Industry and the Efficiency of Information-Based Bank Runs
By Yehning Chen and Iftekhar Hasan
-
Why do Bank Runs Look Like Panic? A New Explanation
By Yehning Chen and Iftekhar Hasan
-
Limited Liability and Bank Herding
By Viral V. Acharya and Tanju Yorulmazer