The Role of Economic Policy after the New Classical Macroeconomics

49 Pages Posted: 25 May 2006 Last revised: 4 Aug 2022

See all articles by Willem H. Buiter

Willem H. Buiter

Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute); Columbia University; Independent Economic Adviser; Independent

Multiple version iconThere are 3 versions of this paper

Date Written: November 1980

Abstract

The paper considers the implications of the rational expectations New Classical Macroeconomics revolution for the 'rules versus discretion' debate. The following issues are covered: 1) The ineffectiveness of anticipated stabilization policy, 2) Non-clausal models and rational expectations, 3) Optimal control in non-causal models -- the inconsistency of optimal plans. I established the robustness of the proposition that contingent (closed-loop or feedback) rules dominate fixed (open-loop)rules. The optimal contingent rule in non-causal models -- the innovation or disturbance-contingent feedback rule -- is quite different from the state-contingent feedback rule derived by dynamic stochastic programming.

Suggested Citation

Buiter, Willem H., The Role of Economic Policy after the New Classical Macroeconomics (November 1980). NBER Working Paper No. w0580, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=264416

Willem H. Buiter (Contact Author)

Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)

London
United Kingdom

CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute)

Poschinger Str. 5
Munich, DE-81679
Germany

HOME PAGE: http://www.CESifo.de

Columbia University ( email )

420 West 118th Street
New York, NY
United States

Independent Economic Adviser ( email )

Independent ( email )

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
40
Abstract Views
711
PlumX Metrics