Cost-Effective Policies to Reduce Vehicle Emissions
13 Pages Posted: 30 Mar 2005 Last revised: 15 Jul 2022
Date Written: March 2005
Abstract
This paper uses an estimated demand system that accounts for heterogeneity to calculate and compare the lost consumer surplus from a higher tax on gasoline, a tax on distance, or a subsidy for buying a newer car. We introduce a view of cost-effectiveness that compares policies instead of technologies. Each tax might induce some consumers to drive less, some to switch from two vehicles to one, and some to buy a car instead of an SUV. Our model captures these behaviors. For each rate of tax, we simulate the changes in all such choices and how the new choices affect emissions. We also calculate the equivalent variation and subtract tax revenue to get deadweight loss. Finally, we take the added deadweight loss over the additional abatement as the social marginal cost of abatement, and we plot this curve for several different tax policies.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Can Taxes on Cars and on Gasoline Mimic an Unavailable Tax on Emissions?
By Don Fullerton and Sarah E. West
-
Tax and Subsidy Combinations for the Control of Car Pollution
By Don Fullerton and Sarah E. West
-
Vehicle Choices, Miles Driven, and Pollution Policies
By Ye Feng, Don Fullerton, ...
-
Suggested Subsidies are Sub-Optimal Unless Combined with an Output Tax
By Don Fullerton and Robert D. Mohr
-
Urban Transport Policies: The Dutch Struggle with Market Failures and Policy Failures
-
Urban Transport Policies: The Dutch Struggle with Market Failures and Policy Failures
-
Consumption Pattern, Income Distribution and the Environment in Brazil
-
Paying for Climate Change Policies in Europe
By Joni Hersch and W. Kip Viscusi