Direct Democracy and Local Public Goods: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia
37 Pages Posted: 30 Jun 2008 Last revised: 5 Aug 2022
Date Written: June 2008
Abstract
This paper presents an experiment where 48 Indonesian villages were randomly assigned to choose development projects through either representative-based meetings or direct election-based plebiscites. Plebiscites resulted in dramatically higher satisfaction among villagers, increased knowledge about the project, greater perceived benefits, and higher reported willingness to contribute. Changing the political mechanism had much smaller effects on the actual projects selected, with some evidence that plebiscites resulted in projects chosen by women being located in poorer areas. The results show that direct participation in political decision making can substantially increase satisfaction and legitimacy, even when it has little effect on actual decisions.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Monitoring Corruption: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia
-
Who Must Pay Bribes and How Much? Evidence from a Cross-Section of Firms
-
Who Must Pay Bribes and How Much? Evidence from a Cross-Section of Firms
-
Tax Rates and Tax Evasion: Evidence from "Missing Imports" in China
By Raymond J. Fisman and Shang-jin Wei
-
Tax Rates and Tax Evasion: Evidence from 'Missing Imports' in China
By Raymond J. Fisman and Shang-jin Wei
-
The Role of Wages and Auditing During a Crackdown on Corruption in the City of Buenos Aires
-
By Edward L. Glaeser and Raven E. Saks
-
By Edward L. Glaeser and Raven E. Saks
-
By Anand Swamy, Young Lee, ...
-
What Determines Corruption? International Evidence from Micro Data