Taxing Leisure Complements
12 Pages Posted: 10 Oct 2008 Last revised: 13 Oct 2008
There are 2 versions of this paper
Taxing Leisure Complements
Date Written: October 2008
Abstract
Ever since Corlett and Hague (1953), it has been understood that it tends to be optimal on second-best grounds to (relatively) tax complements to leisure and subsidize substitutes because doing so helps to offset the distorting effect of taxation on labor supply. Yet in the context of simultaneous optimization of a nonlinear income tax and commodity taxes, Atkinson and Stiglitz (1976) claim to have demonstrated the opposite, that goods complementary with leisure should "face lower tax rates, whereas substitutes face higher tax rates." Derivations in leading texts on optimal taxation seem to yield opposing conclusions regarding the sign of optimal deviation of commodity taxes from uniformity. It is demonstrated that the optimality of relatively taxing leisure complements is indeed correct, and conflicting results are explained.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Louis Kaplow
-
By Louis Kaplow
-
Pareto Efficient and Optimal Taxation and the New New Welfare Economics
-
Distortionary Taxes and the Provision of Public Goods
By Charles Ballard and Don Fullerton
-
The Desirability of Commodity Taxation Under Non-Linear Income Taxation and Heterogeneous Tastes
-
The Theory of Taxation and Public Economics
By Louis Kaplow
-
The Impact of the Estate Tax on the Wealth Accumulation and Avoidance Behavior of Donors
By Joel B. Slemrod and Wojciech Kopczuk
-
On the Undesirability of Commodity Taxation Even When Income Taxation is Not Optimal
By Louis Kaplow
-
On the Undesirability of Commodity Taxation Even When Income Taxation is Not Optimal
By Louis Kaplow