Are Big Cities Bad Places to Live? Estimating Quality of Life Across Metropolitan Areas
67 Pages Posted: 11 Nov 2008 Last revised: 18 Jul 2022
There are 2 versions of this paper
Are Big Cities Bad Places to Live? Estimating Quality of Life Across Metropolitan Areas
Are Big Cities Bad Places to Live? Estimating Quality of Life Across Metropolitan Areas
Date Written: November 2008
Abstract
The standard revealed-preference estimate of a city's quality of life is proportional to that city's cost-of-living relative to its wage-level. Adjusting estimates to account for federal taxes, non-housing costs, and non-labor income produces more plausible quality-of-life estimates than in the previous literature. Unlike previous estimates, adjusted quality-of-life measures successfully predict how housing costs rise with wage levels, are positively correlated with popular "livability" rankings and stated preferences, and do not decrease with city size. Mild seasons, sunshine, hills, and coastal proximity account for most inter-metropolitan quality-of-life differences. Amendments to quality-of-life measures for labor-market disequilibrium and household heterogeneity provide additional insights.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Productivity Gains from Geographic Concentration of Human Capital: Evidence from the Cities
-
By Edward L. Glaeser and David C. Maré
-
Micro-Foundations of Urban Agglomeration Economies
By Gilles Duranton and Diego Puga
-
Micro-Foundations of Urban Agglomeration Economies
By Gilles Duranton and Diego Puga
-
Cities, Skills, and Regional Change
By Edward L. Glaeser, Giacomo A. M. Ponzetto, ...
-
Cities, Skills, and Regional Change
By Edward L. Glaeser, Giacomo A. M. Ponzetto, ...
-
By Edward L. Glaeser, Jed Kolko, ...