Are CEOS Expected Utility Maximizers?
36 Pages Posted: 3 Nov 2009 Last revised: 24 Mar 2023
Date Written: October 2009
Abstract
Are individuals expected utility maximizers? This question represents much more than academic curiosity. In a normative sense, at stake are the fundamental underpinnings of the bulk of the last half-century's models of choice under uncertainty. From a positive perspective, the ubiquitous use of benefit-cost analysis across government agencies renders the expected utility maximization paradigm literally the only game in town. In this study, we advance the literature by exploring CEO's preferences over small probability, high loss lotteries. Using undergraduate students as our experimental control group, we find that both our CEO and student subject pools exhibit frequent and large departures from expected utility theory. In addition, as the extreme payoffs become more likely CEOs exhibit greater aversion to risk. Our results suggest that use of the expected utility paradigm in decision making substantially underestimates society's willingness to pay to reduce risk in small probability, high loss events.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Who Should Abate Carbon Emission? An International Perspective
-
Development and Global Finance: The Case for an International Bank for Environmental Settlements
-
Climate Change and the Irreversibility Effect - Combining Expected Utility and Maximin
-
By Graciela Chichilnisky, Peter Eisenberger, ...
-
The Knowledge Revolution and Its Impact on Consumption and Resource Use