Does Saving Anticipate Declining Labor Income? an Alternative Test of the Permanent Income Hypothesis
42 Pages Posted: 12 Apr 2004 Last revised: 9 Dec 2022
Date Written: 1986
Abstract
The permanent income hypothesis implies that people save because they rationally expect their labor income to decline; they save "for a rainy day". It follows that saving should be at least as good a predictor of declines in labor income as any other forecast that can be constructed from publicly available information.The paper tests this hitherto ignored implication of the permanent income hypothesis, using quarterly aggregate data for the period 1953-84 in the U.S. A vector autoregression for saving and changes in labor income is used to generate an unrestricted forecast of declines in labor income. In the VAR, saving Granger causes labor income changes as one would expect if the PIH is true. The mean of the unrestricted forecast is far from the mean of saving, but the dynamics of the two series are quite similar.The paper presents both formal test statistics and an informal evaluation of the "fit" of the permanent income hypothesis. By contrast with most of the recent literature, the results here are valid when income is nonstationary.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
A Simple Mle of Cointegrating Vectors in Higher Order Integrated Systems
By James H. Stock and Mark W. Watson
-
Stochastic Trends and Economic Fluctuations
By Robert G. King, Charles I. Plosser, ...
-
On the Estimation and Inference of a Cointegrated Regression in Panel Data
By Chihwa Kao and Min-hsien Chiang
-
Interpreting Evidence on Money-Income Causality
By James H. Stock and Mark W. Watson
-
Long-Run Income and Interest Elasticities of Money Demand in the United States
By Dennis L. Hoffman and Robert Rasche
-
Do Equilibrium Real Business Cycle Theories Explain Post-War U.S. Business Cycles?
-
Money, Real Interest Rates, and Output: A Reinterpretation of Postwar U.S. Data
By Robert Litterman and Laurence Weiss
-
A Reappraisal of Recent Tests of the Permanent Income Hypothesis
-
The Power of Single Equation Tests for Cointegration When the Cointegrating Vector is Prespecified
By Eric Zivot