Does Planning Regulation Protect Independent Retailers?
75 Pages Posted: 10 Jan 2014 Last revised: 4 Feb 2023
Date Written: January 2014
Abstract
Regulations aimed at curbing the entry of large retail stores have been introduced in many countries to protect independent retailers. Analyzing a planning reform launched in the United Kingdom in the 1990s, I show that independent retailers were actually harmed by the creation of entry barriers against large stores. Instead of simply reducing the number of new large stores entering a market, the entry barriers created the incentive for large retail chains to invest in smaller and more centrally located formats, which competed more directly with independents and accelerated their decline. Overall, these findings suggest that restricting the entry of large stores does not necessarily lead to a world with fewer stores, but one with different stores, with uncertain competitive effects on independent retailers.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
CPI Bias from Supercenters: Does the BLS Know that Wal-Mart Exists?
By Jerry A. Hausman and Ephraim Leibtag
-
Consumer Benefits from Increased Competition in Shopping Outlets: Measuring the Effect of Wal-Mart
By Jerry A. Hausman and Ephraim Leibtag