Premium Transparency in the Medicare Advantage Market: Implications for Premiums, Benefits, and Efficiency

41 Pages Posted: 16 Jun 2014 Last revised: 20 Mar 2023

See all articles by Karen Stockley

Karen Stockley

Harvard University

Thomas G. McGuire

Harvard University - Department of Health Care Policy

Chris Afendulis

Harvard University - Department of Health Care Policy

Michael Chernew

Harvard University - Department of Health Care Policy; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Date Written: June 2014

Abstract

In the Medicare Advantage (MA) market, private health insurers compete to offer plans with the most attractive premium and benefit package. Medicare provides a subsidy, based on a "benchmark payment rate", for each Medicare beneficiary a plan enrolls. We investigate how this subsidy, the primary policy lever in the market, affects the equilibrium premiums and benefits of MA plans. We exploit variation in benchmark payment rates within plans over time, coming from rebasing years where benchmark changes differed across areas in ways that were plausibly exogenous, to determine empirically how plan premiums and benefit generosity respond to changes in benchmarks. We find that premiums do not respond to changes in the benchmark payment rate on average but that insurers do pass through a portion of the benchmark increase by increasing plan benefit generosity. We argue that the way premium information is communicated to consumers influences the way in which plans pass through subsidy dollars and can account for the empirical results. More specifically, institutional features make it difficult for consumers to observe a large component of the plan premium, leading to a lack of demand response to premium reductions below the premium charged by traditional Medicare (the fee-for-service Part B premium). When demand does not respond to lower premiums, plans have an incentive to pass-through cost subsidies to consumers via more generous benefits that consumers may not value at cost, creating an inefficiently high level of benefit generosity. Our results provide evidence that a lack of premium transparency in the MA market may distort the combination of premium levels and benefit generosity offered in equilibrium, resulting in some degree of inefficiently high benefits. We conclude by discussing changes to the choice environment that would increase premium transparency and potentially soften the premium rigidities we find.

Suggested Citation

Stockley, Karen and McGuire, Thomas G. and Afendulis, Chris and Chernew, Michael E., Premium Transparency in the Medicare Advantage Market: Implications for Premiums, Benefits, and Efficiency (June 2014). NBER Working Paper No. w20208, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2450909

Karen Stockley (Contact Author)

Harvard University ( email )

Thomas G. McGuire

Harvard University - Department of Health Care Policy ( email )

180 Longwood Ave
Boston, MA 02115
United States

Chris Afendulis

Harvard University - Department of Health Care Policy ( email )

180 Longwood Avenue
Boston, MA 02115
United States

Michael E. Chernew

Harvard University - Department of Health Care Policy ( email )

25 Shattuck Street
Boston, MA 02115
United States

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
35
Abstract Views
598
PlumX Metrics