Employee Crime, Monitoring, and the Efficiency Wage Hypothesis
23 Pages Posted: 6 Apr 2007 Last revised: 11 Dec 2022
Date Written: August 1987
Abstract
This paper offers some observations on employee crime, economic theories of crime, limits on bonding, and the efficiency wage hypothesis. We demonstrate that the simplest economic theories of crime predict that profit-maximizing firms should follow strategies of minimal monitoring and large penalties for employee crime. Finding overwhelming empirical evidence that firms expend considerable resources trying to detect employee malfeasance and do not impose extremely large penalties, we investigate a number of possible reasons why the simple model's predictions fail. It turns out that plausible explanations for firms large outlays on monitoring of employees also justify the payment of premium wages in some circumstances. There is no legitimate a priori argument that firms should not pay efficiency wages once it is recognized that they expend significant resources on monitoring.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By John S. Earle, Andrew Spicer, ...
-
Equilibrium Wage Arrears: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Institutional Lock-In
-
Do Deferred Wages Dominate Involuntary Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device?
-
Workers' Heterogeneity and Risk Aversion: A Segmentation Model of the Russian Labour Market
By Irena Grosfeld, Claudia Senik, ...
-
Wage Arrears, Poverty, and Family Survival Strategies in Russia
By Padma Desai and Todd Idson
-
To Pay or Not to Pay: Managerial Decision Making and Wage Withholding in Russia
By Padma Desai and Todd Idson
-
Riding the Transition Roller-Coaster: Flexibility and the Inter-Industry Wage Structure in Russia
-
Labor Hoarding in Russia: Where Does it Come from?
By Rouslan Koumakhov and Boris Najman