The Continued Interest Rate Vulnerability of Thrifts
38 Pages Posted: 5 Oct 2009 Last revised: 2 Nov 2022
Date Written: August 1990
Abstract
The 1980s S&L debacle is generally viewed as the result of: (1) sharply rising interest rates eliminating the net worth of thrifts funding fixed-rate loans with short-term deposits and (2) thrifts responding by taking even greater interest-rate and credit risks. The question investigated in this paper is how vulnerable do thrifts remain to an interest rate experience like that which triggered the 1980s S&L debacle? The short answer is that thrifts are even more vulnerable in 1989 than they were in 1977. The dollar volume of fixed-rate mortgages funded by short-term deposits in 1989, $400 billion, is slightly greater now than it was in 1977, and thrifts have also put over $325 billion of adjustable-rate loans with rate caps on their balance sheets. A sharp rise in interest rates (the one-year Treasury rate rose by 9 percentage points between 1977 and 1981) would cause significant losses on these capped loans, as well as on the fixed-rate loans.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Innovations in Credit Risk Transfer: Implications for Financial Stability
-
Credit Derivatives, Disintermediation and Investment Decisions
-
Credit Risk Transfer and Contagion
By Franklin Allen and Elena Carletti
-
By Franklin Allen and Douglas M. Gale
-
Systemic Risk in the Financial Sector: An Analysis of the Subprime-Mortgage Financial Crisis
-
Credit Risk Transfer and Financial Sector Performance
By Wolf Wagner and Ian W. Marsh
-
Credit Risk Transfer and Financial Sector Performance
By Wolf Wagner and Ian W. Marsh
-
Default Risk Sharing between Banks and Markets: The Contribution of Collateralized Debt Obligations
By Guenter Franke and Jan Pieter Krahnen