Is Price Adjustment Asymmetric?: Evaluating the Market Share and Marketing Bottlenecks Hypothesis
28 Pages Posted: 26 May 2011 Last revised: 29 Nov 2022
Date Written: September 1992
Abstract
The theoretical literature on pricing-to-market has identified two possible reasons why the elasticity of prices to exchange rate changes may be asymmetric across appreciations and depreciations. If firms are attempting to increase market shares in foreign markets subject to the possibility of trade restrictions, then more pricing-to-market may occur during appreciations of the exporter's currency. If firms face capacity constraints in their distribution networks, then pricing-to-market may be exaggerated during periods of depreciation of the exporters currency. This paper uses panel data on German and Japanese 7-digit industry exports to compare these competing explanations for asymmetries in pricing-to-market behavior. While the data seldom reject the null hypothesis of a symmetric response of prices to exchange rates, some industries, notably automobiles, provide empirical support for the market share model. Only a pooled regression with Japanese data supports the marketing bottlenecks model.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Risk Management: Coordinating Corporate Investment and Financing Policies
By Kenneth Froot, David S. Scharfstein, ...
-
Why Firms Use Currency Derivatives
By Christopher Geczy, Bernadette A. Minton, ...
-
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm Market Value
-
Exchange Rate Exposure, Hedging, and the Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives
-
Do Firms Hedge in Response to Tax Incentives?
By John R. Graham and Daniel A. Rogers
-
How Much Do Firms Hedge with Derivatives?
By Wayne R. Guay and S.p. Kothari
-
How Much Do Firms Hedge with Derivatives?
By Wayne R. Guay and S.p. Kothari
-
By John M. Griffin and René M. Stulz