Are Ols Estimates of the Return to Schooling Biased Downward? Another Look
35 Pages Posted: 27 Apr 2000 Last revised: 22 Aug 2022
Date Written: January 1993
Abstract
We examine evidence on omitted-ability bias in estimates of the economic return to schooling, using proxies for unobserved ability. We consider measurement error in these ability proxies and the potential endogeneity of both experience and schooling, and examine wages at labor market entry and later. Including ability proxies reduces the estimate of the return to schooling, and instrumenting for these proxies reduces the estimated return still further. Instrumenting for schooling leads to considerably higher estimates of the return to schooling, although only for wages at labor market entry. This estimated return generally reverts to being near (although still above) the OLS estimate if we allow experience to be endogenous. In contrast, for observations at least a few years after labor market entry, the evidence indicates that OLS estimates of the return to schooling that ignore omitted ability are, if anything, biased upward rather than downward.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Estimates of the Economic Return to Schooling from a New Sample of Twins
By Orley Ashenfelter and Alan B. Krueger
-
Education for Growth: Why and for Whom?
By Alan B. Krueger and Mikael Lindahl
-
Education for Growth: Why and for Whom?
By Alan B. Krueger and Mikael Lindahl
-
By Esther Duflo
-
By Esther Duflo
-
Income, Schooling, and Ability: Evidence from a New Sample of Identical Twins
-
Using Geographic Variation in College Proximity to Estimate the Return to Schooling
By David Card