Why is There Corporate Taxation in a Small Open Economy? The Role of Transfer Pricing and Income Shifting
35 Pages Posted: 10 Jun 2000 Last revised: 27 Oct 2022
Date Written: March 1994
Abstract
Several recent papers argue that corporate income taxes should not be used by small, open economies. With capital mobility, the burden of the tax falls on fixed factors (e.g., labor), and the tax system is more efficient if labor is taxed directly. However, corporate taxes not only exist but rates are roughly comparable with the top personal tax rates. Past models also forecast that multinationals should not invest in countries with low corporate tax rates, since the surtax they owe when profits are repatriated puts them at a competitive disadvantage. Yet such foreign direct investment is substantial. We suggest that the resolution of these puzzles may be found in the role of income shifting, both domestic (between the personal and corporate tax bases) and cross-border (through transfer pricing). Countries need cash-flow corporate taxes as a backstop to labor taxes to discourage individuals from converting their labor income into otherwise untaxed corporate income. We explore how these taxes can best be modified to deal as well with cross-border shifting.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Fiscal Paradise: Foreign Tax Havens and American Business
By James R. Hines Jr. and Eric M. Rice
-
Altered States: Taxes and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment in America
-
Tax Policy and Foreign Direct Investment in the United States
-
Coming Home to America: Dividend Repatriations by U.S. Multinationals
-
Taxation and Foreign Direct Investment: A Synthesis of Empirical Research
By Ruud A. De Mooij and Sjef Ederveen
-
Income Shifting in U.S. Multinational Corporations
By David Harris, Randall Morck, ...