Policies for Green Design
24 Pages Posted: 13 Sep 1999 Last revised: 16 Oct 2022
Date Written: May 1996
Abstract
We analyze alternative policies such as a disposal content fee, a subsidy for recyclable designs, unit pricing of household disposal, a deposit-refund system, and a manufacturer `take-back' requirement. In order to identify the problem being addressed, we build a simple general equilibrium model in which household utility depends on a negative externality from total waste generation, and in which firms use primary and recycled inputs to produce output that has two `attributes': packaging per unit output, and recyclability. If households pay the social cost of disposal, then they send the right signals to producers to reduce packaging and to design products that can more easily be recycled. But if local governments are constrained to collect household garbage for free, then households do not send the right signals to producers. The socially optimal attributes can still be achieved by a tax on producers' use of packaging and subsidy to producers' use of recyclable designs.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Extended Producer Responsibility and Product Design: Economic Theory and Selected Case Studies
-
Catching Up and Falling Behind: The Performance of Provincial GDP Per Capita from 1990 to 2003
By John R. Baldwin, W. Mark Brown, ...
-
The Impacts of Sharing Responsibility for Product Recovery across the Supply Chain
By Brian Jacobs and Ravi Subramanian