Pairs Trading: Performance of a Relative Value Arbitrage Rule
35 Pages Posted: 20 Sep 2000 Last revised: 19 Sep 2022
Date Written: March 1999
Abstract
We test a Wall Street investment strategy known as pairs trading' with daily data over the period 1962 through 1997. Stocks are matched into pairs according to minimum distance in historical normalized price space. We test the profitability of several trading rules with six-month trading periods over the 1962-1997 period, and find average annualized excess returns of up to 12 percent for a number of self-financing portfolios of top pairs. Part of these profits may be due to market microstructure effects. Nevertheless, our historical trading profits exceed a conservative estimate of transaction costs through most of the period. We bootstrap random pairs in order to distinguish pairs trading from pure mean-reversion strategies. The bootstrap results suggest that the pairs' effect differs from previously documented mean reversion profits.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Institutional Investors and Equity Prices
By Paul A. Gompers and Andrew Metrick
-
New Evidence on Stock Price Effects Associated with Charges in the S&P 500 Index
-
Limited Arbitrage in Mergers and Acquisitions
By Malcolm P. Baker and Serkan Savasoglu
-
The Demand for Stocks: An Analysis of IPO Auctions
By Shmuel Kandel (deceased), Oded Sarig, ...
-
Arbitrage Risk and the Book-to-Market Anomaly
By Ashiq Ali, Lee-seok Hwang, ...