Local Revenue Hills: A General Equilibrium Specification with Evidence from Four U.S. Cities
62 Pages Posted: 17 May 2000 Last revised: 12 Oct 2022
Date Written: March 2000
Abstract
We provide estimates of the impact and long-run elasticities of tax base with respect to tax rates for four large U.S. cities: Houston (property taxation), Minneapolis (property taxation), New York City (property, general sales, and income taxation), and Philadelphia (property, gross receipts, and wage taxation). Results suggest that all four of our cities are near the peaks of their longer-run revenue hills. Equilibrium effects are observed within three to four fiscal years after the initial increase in local tax rates. A significant negative impact (current period) effect of a balanced budget increase in city property tax rates on city property base is interpreted as a capitalization effect and suggests that marginal increases in city spending do not provide positive net benefits to property owners. Estimates of the effects of taxes on city employment levels for New York City and Philadelphia the two cities for which employment series are available show the local income and wage tax rates have significant negative effects on city employment levels.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Should Suburbs Help Their Central City?
By Andrew Haughwout and Robert P. Inman
-
Fiscal Policies in Open Cities with Firms and Households
By Andrew Haughwout and Robert P. Inman
-
Local Revenue Hills: Evidence from Four U.S. Cities
By Andrew Haughwout, Robert P. Inman, ...