Government Size and Output Volatility: Should We Forsake Automatic Stabilization?
55 Pages Posted: 1 Jul 2008
Date Written: May 2008
Abstract
The paper takes stock of the debate on the positive link between output volatility and the size of government - which reflects automatic stabilizers. After a survey of the literature, we show that the contribution of automatic stabilizers to output stability may have disappeared since the 1990s. However, econometric analysis suggests that the breakdown in the government size-volatility relationship largely reflects temporary developments (better monetary management and financial intermediation). Once these factors are taken into account, the stabilizing role of government size remains important although little extra stability can be gained by expanding public expenditure beyond 40 percent of GDP.
Keywords: Working Paper, Government expenditures, Financial stability, Gross domestic product
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Has the Business Cycle Changed and Why?
By James H. Stock and Mark W. Watson
-
Output Fluctuations in the United States: What Has Changed Since the Early 1980s?
-
Time Varying Structural Vector Autoregressions and Monetary Policy
-
Recent U.S. Macroeconomic Stability: Good Policies, Good Practices, or Good Luck?
By Shaghil Ahmed, Andrew T. Levin, ...
-
On the Causes of the Increased Stability of the U.S. Economy
By James A. Kahn, Margaret Mary Mcconnell, ...
-
The Rise in Firm-Level Volatility: Causes and Consequences
By Diego Comin and Thomas Philippon
-
The Rise in Firm-Level Volatility: Causes and Consequences
By Diego Comin and Thomas Philippon
-
The Rise in Firm-Level Volatility: Causes and Consequences
By Diego A. Comin and Thomas Philippon
-
The Estimation of Prewar Gnp: Methodology and New Evidence
By Nathan S. Balke and Robert J. Gordon