ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CONTOURING OF CARDIAC SUBSTRUCTURES IN RADIATION THERAPY: A COMPARISON OF SOLUTIONS

17 Pages Posted: 13 Nov 2025

See all articles by Alexandra Moignier

Alexandra Moignier

Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest

Tanguy Perennec

Institut de Cancerologie de l’Ouest

Elise Prangères

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Bastien Bernard

Siemens Healthineers

Angela Botticella

Gustave Roussy

Xinru Chen

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Robert Finnegan

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Sandrine Huger

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Anna Karlhede

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Thomas Lacornerie

University of Lille II - Centre Oscar Lambret

Fredrik Löfman

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Jérémy Palisson

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Charlotte Robert

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Killian Sambourg

University of Paris-Saclay - Institut Gustave Roussy

Jonas Söderberg

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Remus Stoica

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Grégory Delpon

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Elvire Martin-Mervoyer

affiliation not provided to SSRN

François Thillays

René Gauducheau

Loig Vaugier

Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest

Abstract

Background and Purpose Artificial-intelligence (AI)-based contouring tools have emerged to improve the assessment of radiation doses to cardiac substructures beyond the mean heart dose. This study compares the raw results from multiple solutions and evaluates the impact of non-contrast enhancement on the contours for each solution.Materials and Methods Twenty lung cancer patients with both contrast-enhanced (CE-CT) and non-contrast enhanced (NCE-CT) thoracic scans, sequentially acquired during the same session, were analyzed. 7 commercial, 3 open-source, and one in-house AI solutions were compared on CE-CT using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and the 95th percentile of Hausdorff distance (HD95). Volume ratios between NCE-CT and CE-CT were calculated to quantify the impact of non-contrast enhancement on contours for each solution.Results Typically, 10 cardiac substructures including the whole heart, are contoured by most of the solutions. For the whole heart, the cavities and the great vessels, median DSC is above 0.8 for approximately half of the structure-solution pairs, and median HD95 is below 1 cm for more than one third of these pairs. For the coronary arteries, median DSC is schematically either around 0.5 or close to 0 and median HD95 ranges between 1 cm and 7 cm.Non-contrast enhancement affected results variably across solutions and substructures. Except for one solution, volume differences are below 10% for most of the structure-solution pairs.Conclusions Automatic solutions provide inter-solution differences for cardiac substructures that could have clinical impact. Detailed information and standardization of the models, ideally through international consensus and shared datasets, are essential.

Note:
Funding Information: Dr Loïg Vaugier and Alexandra Moignier has a partnership with RaySearch Laboratories for detailed heart model development Dr Angela Botticella has a partnership with Therapanacea for detailed heart model development.

Declaration of Interests: None declared.

Keywords: artificial intelligence-based contouring, cardiac substructures, influence of contrast in CT images, radiotherapy, comparison of solutions

Suggested Citation

Moignier, Alexandra and Perennec, Tanguy and Prangères, Elise and Bernard, Bastien and Botticella, Angela and Chen, Xinru and Finnegan, Robert and Huger, Sandrine and Karlhede, Anna and Lacornerie, Thomas and Löfman, Fredrik and Palisson, Jérémy and Robert, Charlotte and Sambourg, Killian and Söderberg, Jonas and Stoica, Remus and Delpon, Grégory and Martin-Mervoyer, Elvire and Thillays, François and Vaugier, Loig, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CONTOURING OF CARDIAC SUBSTRUCTURES IN RADIATION THERAPY: A COMPARISON OF SOLUTIONS. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5712367 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5712367

Alexandra Moignier (Contact Author)

Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest ( email )

Tanguy Perennec

Institut de Cancerologie de l’Ouest ( email )

Elise Prangères

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Bastien Bernard

Siemens Healthineers ( email )

Princeton, NJ
United States

Angela Botticella

Gustave Roussy ( email )

Villejuif
France

Xinru Chen

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Robert Finnegan

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Sandrine Huger

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Anna Karlhede

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Thomas Lacornerie

University of Lille II - Centre Oscar Lambret ( email )

France

Fredrik Löfman

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Jérémy Palisson

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Charlotte Robert

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Killian Sambourg

University of Paris-Saclay - Institut Gustave Roussy ( email )

114 Rue Edouard Vaillant
Villejuif, 94800
France

Jonas Söderberg

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Remus Stoica

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Grégory Delpon

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Elvire Martin-Mervoyer

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

François Thillays

René Gauducheau ( email )

France

Loig Vaugier

Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest ( email )

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
99
Abstract Views
180
Rank
694,528
PlumX Metrics