Empirical Analysis of Indian Patent Cases Post-2005

20 Pages Posted: 17 Nov 2012

See all articles by Aditi Ghosh

Aditi Ghosh

Law School, IIT Kharagpur; Independent

Date Written: April 28, 2012


Can we say today that India has woken up to patent protection and patent litigation or do we still have a long way to go? Have our courts become proactive in taking up patent cases and deciding them on merits or are they summarily decided? And in how many cases is there a substantial discussion on the technology and science involved in the patent and how many are decided on procedural matters of the patent law? And many more questions on similar lines arise when we look at the patent cases that come up before courts today and look back at the past decades for comparison. However the bright side of things is that our patent procedural law which has been evolving and can be said to have become a lot more robust than before and at the same time meeting India’s obligations towards TRIPS agreement. The most significant recent amendment to our Indian Patent Act, 1970 has been the 2005 Amendments. In this paper the author has tried to bring out an empirical study of the cases that have been brought before the courts - High Courts, Supreme Court and the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) - keeping 2005 as the benchmark owing to the changes brought about by the amendment and in general changes taking place with more awareness of IP rights.

Keywords: Indian patent, litigation, case laws, empirical analysis, trends

Suggested Citation

Ghosh, Aditi, Empirical Analysis of Indian Patent Cases Post-2005 (April 28, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2176263 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2176263

Aditi Ghosh (Contact Author)

Law School, IIT Kharagpur ( email )

IIT Kharagpur
West Bengal
Kharagpur, West Bengal 721302

Independent ( email )

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics