Governing Law on Forum-Selection Agreements

Kevin M. Clermont

Cornell Law School

September 13, 2014

66 Hastings L.J. #3 (2015)
Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 14-22

The judicial task of fixing on the proper law to govern a contractual choice-of-forum clause comprises an enigma. The key to its solution lies at the very heart of the subject, where one encounters its most celebrated riddle: Which law governs when the parties have also agreed to a choice-of-law clause, that is, does one first test the forum-selection clause under the law of the seised forum or does one first look at the parties’ choice of law to apply the chosen law to the forum-selection clause?

This chicken-or-egg mystery throws courts into contortions. Prior commentators opt for the chosen law. But differentiated cases, policy arguments, and doctrinal consistency all support applying lex fori to enforceability of the forum-selection agreement — while applying the chosen law as to the agreement’s interpretation or, in the absence of a choice-of-law clause, the chosen court’s law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 27

Keywords: Forum-selection, choice of law

JEL Classification: K12, K33, K41

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 23, 2014 ; Last revised: September 14, 2014

Suggested Citation

Clermont, Kevin M., Governing Law on Forum-Selection Agreements (September 13, 2014). 66 Hastings L.J. #3 (2015); Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 14-22. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2457443

Contact Information

Kevin M. Clermont (Contact Author)
Cornell Law School ( email )
Myron Taylor Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
607-255-5189 (Phone)
607-255-7193 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,060
Downloads: 201
Download Rank: 119,393