'If We are Wrong...The Courts Will Correct It': Position-Taking, Judicial Review, and Legislative Voting

32 Pages Posted: 13 Mar 2015 Last revised: 14 Mar 2015

See all articles by Joseph Daniel Ura

Joseph Daniel Ura

Texas A&M University - Department of Political Science

Date Written: March 11, 2015

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that the institution of judicial review affects the decision calculus of legislative voters by reducing the expected utility of supporting a legislative proposal with respect to policy change, while leaving the position taking value of legislation intact. I develop this argument through formal theoretical models of legislative decision making, and I test the predictions of these models empirically by analyzing a series votes cast in the United States Congress surrounding the issue of flag burning in 1989 and 1990. Observed patterns of voting across these legislative proposals support the models’ comparative predictions.

Keywords: Congress, judicial review, legislative voting, position-taking, Supreme Court

Suggested Citation

Ura, Joseph Daniel, 'If We are Wrong...The Courts Will Correct It': Position-Taking, Judicial Review, and Legislative Voting (March 11, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2576916 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2576916

Joseph Daniel Ura (Contact Author)

Texas A&M University - Department of Political Science ( email )

4348 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-4348
United States

HOME PAGE: http://people.tamu.edu/~jura

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
19
Abstract Views
330
PlumX Metrics