Rail Lines and Demarcation Lines: A Response

Jeremy Ferwerda

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

Nicholas Miller

Brown University

July 8, 2015

In Ferwerda and Miller (2014), we assess whether granting governing authority to natives reduces resistance to foreign rule. We find that devolving authority significantly lowered levels of violent resistance in WW2 France, an effect we argue is driven by a process of political cooptation. Kocher and Monteiro (2015) challenge these results, arguing that the Germans deliberately placed the demarcation line in proximity to strategic railroads, and that due to external involvement by Allies, the locations of resistance events should not be used to infer political motivations. In this research note, we argue that these critiques do not undermine our core findings. Specifically, we demonstrate (1) that Kocher and Monteiro's account overstates the importance of 'strategic' railways in determining the location of the line, (2) that the presence of these railway lines cannot fully account for our findings, and (3) that resistance was locally-rooted, began before D-Day, and was not directed by the Allies in the regions from which we derive our inferences.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: occupation, resistance, World War II

JEL Classification: C99, N44

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 10, 2015 ; Last revised: July 11, 2015

Suggested Citation

Ferwerda, Jeremy and Miller, Nicholas, Rail Lines and Demarcation Lines: A Response (July 8, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2628508 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2628508

Contact Information

Jeremy Ferwerda (Contact Author)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) ( email )
77 Massachusetts Avenue
50 Memorial Drive
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
United States
Nicholas Miller
Brown University ( email )
Box 1860
Providence, RI 02912
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,383
Downloads: 179
Download Rank: 133,253