Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

The Law of Walls

European Journal of International Law, Vol 28 (No 2), 2017

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2734315

26 Pages Posted: 20 Feb 2016 Last revised: 24 Jan 2017

Moria Paz

Stanford Law School

Date Written: February 12, 2016

Abstract

Recently, Western democracies have turned to building border walls as a strategy of immigration control. This paper makes two claims. First, human rights courts and quasi-judicial bodies are deeply implicated in this move. Drawing on an analysis of case law, I show that they have worked out a system in which walls have become a predictable strategic solution for states that seek to retain control over immigration. Second, the way human rights enforcement bodies have treated border walls has made them legally permitted and even encouraged their construction. Immigration walls raise a jurisdictional challenge. Human rights law and the national law of many democratic states guarantee individuals that have established territorial presence access to basic human rights. A porous border is thus required by the very concept of universal human rights. In one view, because a wall is concrete in a way that the jurisdictional border is not, erecting a wall closes the porous border and is thus a matter of human rights. In another view, the construction of a wall is an administrative technique for controlling immigration and is, from a human rights perspective, a non-event. Neither view, however, can be wholly supported. The first is politically unsustainable, while the second is morally indefensible. Human rights enforcement bodies avoid taking a stand by regulating the physical structure of the wall. The result is the redrawing of borders that is politically unstable and is normatively unjustifiable.

Suggested Citation

Paz, Moria, The Law of Walls (February 12, 2016). European Journal of International Law, Vol 28 (No 2), 2017; Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2734315. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2734315 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2734315

Moria Paz (Contact Author)

Stanford Law School ( email )

559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
170
Rank
151,331
Abstract Views
628