The Silence Penalty

38 Pages Posted: 22 Mar 2017 Last revised: 4 May 2017

Jeffrey Bellin

William & Mary Law School

Date Written: March 1, 2017

Abstract

In every criminal trial, the defendant possesses the right to testify. Deciding whether to exercise that right, however, is rarely easy. Declining to testify shields defendants from questioning by the prosecutor and normally precludes the introduction of a defendant’s prior crimes. But silence comes at a price. Jurors penalize defendants who fail to testify by inferring guilt from silence.

This Article explores this complex dynamic, focusing on empirical evidence from mock juror experiments – including the results of a new 400-person mock juror simulation conducted for this Article – and data from real trials. It concludes that the penalty defendants suffer when they refuse to testify is substantial, rivaling the more widely-recognized damage done to a defendant’s trial prospects by the introduction of a criminal record. Moreover, these two penalties work in tandem, creating a “parallel penalty” effect that systemically diminishes the prospects of acquittal and incentivizes guilty pleas.

The empirical evidence surveyed, including the new juror simulation, will be of obvious interest to participants in the criminal justice system. But, as the Article explains, the data also present a powerful indictment of the system itself.

Keywords: criminal justice, fifth amendment, juries

Suggested Citation

Bellin, Jeffrey, The Silence Penalty (March 1, 2017). Iowa Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2938527

Jeffrey Bellin (Contact Author)

William & Mary Law School ( email )

South Henry Street
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
239
Rank
104,681
Abstract Views
609