Jeffrey M. Kuhn

University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Kenan-Flagler Business School

McColl Building

Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3490

United States

  • University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Kenan-Flagler Business School

SCHOLARLY PAPERS

8

DOWNLOADS
Rank 16,618

SSRN RANKINGS

Top 16,618

in Total Papers Downloads

2,686

CITATIONS
Rank 44,960

SSRN RANKINGS

Top 44,960

in Total Papers Citations

3

Scholarly Papers (8)

Actions:
Email selected abstracts
1.

An Estoppel Doctrine for Patented Standards

California Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 1, 2009
Number of pages: 43 Posted: 28 May 2008 Last Revised: 26 May 2014
Robert P. Merges and Jeffrey M. Kuhn
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law and University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Kenan-Flagler Business School
Downloads 746 (30,480)

Abstract:

Loading...

patents, standards, estoppel, network effects, lock-in, lock in, patent misuse, strategic assertion, laches, waiver, antitrust, reliance, bait and switch, snake in the grass, SSOs, SSO, network industries

2.

Patent-to-Patent Similarity: A Vector Space Model

Number of pages: 39 Posted: 30 Dec 2015 Last Revised: 19 Aug 2016
Kenneth A. Younge and Jeffrey M. Kuhn
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne and University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Kenan-Flagler Business School
Downloads 690 (33,865)

Abstract:

Loading...

patent data, technology space, similarity, relatedness

3.

Patent Citations Reexamined

Number of pages: 36 Posted: 14 Jan 2016 Last Revised: 23 Jun 2018
Jeffrey M. Kuhn, Kenneth A. Younge and Alan C. Marco
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Kenan-Flagler Business School, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne and Georgia Institute of Technology - School of Public Policy
Downloads 522 (48,841)

Abstract:

Loading...

patents, citations, innovation economics, USPTO, examiner, applicant, rejections

4.

How to Measure and Draw Causal Inferences with Patent Scope

International Journal of the Economics of Business, Forthcoming
Number of pages: 38 Posted: 30 May 2017 Last Revised: 14 Nov 2017
Jeffrey M. Kuhn and Neil Thompson
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Kenan-Flagler Business School and MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL)
Downloads 246 (116,320)

Abstract:

Loading...

patent scope, patents, causal inference, innovation, measurement, patent examiners, examiner toughness

5.

Patentable Subject Matter Matters: New Uses for an Old Doctrine

Berkley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 22, No. 89, 2007
Number of pages: 26 Posted: 02 Jul 2008
Jeffrey M. Kuhn
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Kenan-Flagler Business School
Downloads 162 (171,946)
Citation 3

Abstract:

Loading...

Patents Patentable Patentability Subject Matter Doctrine Physically Change Modify Lab. Corp. Metabolite business methods software biotechnology

6.

Does Winning a Patent Race Lead to More Follow-On Innovation?

Number of pages: 48 Posted: 15 Jan 2017
Neil Thompson and Jeffrey M. Kuhn
MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL) and University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Kenan-Flagler Business School
Downloads 146 (187,516)

Abstract:

Loading...

Patent Race, Intellectual Property, Innovation

7.

Property Rights and Frictions in the Sale of Patents

Number of pages: 50 Posted: 13 Nov 2016
Jeffrey M. Kuhn
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Kenan-Flagler Business School
Downloads 130 (205,927)

Abstract:

Loading...

innovation, patents, intellectual property, right to exclude, market exclusivity

8.

Information Overload at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office: Reframing the Duty of Disclosure in Patent Law as a Search and Filter Problem

Yale Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 13, pp. 90-139, 2010
Number of pages: 51 Posted: 06 Mar 2012
Jeffrey M. Kuhn
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Kenan-Flagler Business School
Downloads 44 (385,105)

Abstract:

Loading...

Duty of Disclosure, Information Overload, Inequitable Conduct, USPTO, Patent Office, Innovation Policy, Information Technology