Author Page for John R. Allison

Valuable Patents

Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 92, p. 435, 2004, George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 03-31, UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 133

Number of pages: 60 Posted: 30 Jul 2003

John R. Allison, Mark A. Lemley, Kimberly A. Moore and R. Derek Trunkey

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Stanford Law School, affiliation not provided to SSRN and CBO

Downloads 6,707 (1,010)

Citation 1

Abstract:

Valuable Patents

Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 92, p. 435, 2004, George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 03-31

Posted: 02 May 2007

John R. Allison, Mark A. Lemley, Kimberly A. Moore and R. Derek Trunkey

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Stanford Law School, affiliation not provided to SSRN and CBO

Abstract:

2.

Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents

Downloads 3,116 ( 3,861)

Citation 57

2

Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents

American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) Quarterly Journal, Vol. 26, p. 185, 1998

Number of pages: 84 Posted: 28 Aug 1998 Last Revised: 01 Jun 2014

John R. Allison and Mark A. Lemley

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Stanford Law School

Downloads 3,116 (3,784)

Citation 57

Abstract:

Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents

American Intellectual Property Law Association Quarterly Journal, Vol. 26, p. 185, 1998

Posted: 10 Sep 2001

John R. Allison and Mark A. Lemley

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Stanford Law School

Abstract:

3.

Understanding the Realities of Modern Patent Litigation

92 Texas Law Review 1769 (2014), Chicago-Kent College of Law Research Paper No. 2014-12, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2442451

Number of pages: 33 Posted: 28 May 2014 Last Revised: 07 Oct 2014

John R. Allison, Mark A. Lemley and David L. Schwartz

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Stanford Law School and Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law

Downloads 2,173 (7,070)

Citation 1

Abstract:

4.

Patent Quality and Settlement among Repeat Patent Litigants

Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 398, 99 Georgetown Law Journal 677 (2011)

Number of pages: 31 Posted: 20 Sep 2010 Last Revised: 28 Apr 2020

John R. Allison, Joshua H. Walker and Mark A. Lemley

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP and Stanford Law School

Downloads 2,132 (7,301)

Citation 28

Abstract:

5.

Who's Patenting What? An Empirical Exploration of Patent Prosecution

Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 53, p. 2099, 2000, UC Berkeley, Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 19, University of Texas Public Law & Legal Theory, Research Paper No. 010

Number of pages: 81 Posted: 13 Jun 2000

John R. Allison and Mark A. Lemley

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Stanford Law School

Downloads 1,471 (13,372)

Citation 24

Abstract:

6.

Extreme Value or Trolls on Top? The Characteristics of the Most Litigated Patents

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 158, No. 1, December 2009, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1407796

Number of pages: 37 Posted: 21 May 2009 Last Revised: 30 Sep 2012

John R. Allison, Mark A. Lemley and Joshua H. Walker

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Stanford Law School and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP

Downloads 1,359 (15,152)

Citation 4

Abstract:

7.

The (Unnoticed) Demise of the Doctrine of Equivalents

59 Stanford Law Review 955 (2007)

Number of pages: 31 Posted: 12 Jan 2007 Last Revised: 30 Apr 2020

John R. Allison and Mark A. Lemley

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Stanford Law School

Downloads 1,021 (23,268)

Abstract:

8.

The Business Method Patent Myth

Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 18, Fall 2003

Number of pages: 93 Posted: 28 Jul 2003

John R. Allison and Emerson H. Tiller

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law

Downloads 974 (24,952)

Citation 13

Abstract:

9.

The Growing Complexity of the United States Patent System

Boston University Law Review, Vol. 82, p. 77, 2002

Number of pages: 85 Posted: 08 Sep 2001

John R. Allison and Mark A. Lemley

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Stanford Law School

Downloads 934 (26,450)

Citation 8

Abstract:

10.

The Evolution of Chinese Attitudes Toward Property Rights in Invention and Discovery

Number of pages: 68 Posted: 20 Apr 2000

John R. Allison and Lianlian Lin

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Downloads 741 (36,567)

Citation 3

Abstract:

11.

Our Divided Patent System

University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 82, pp. 1073-1154 (2015), Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2510004, Chicago-Kent College of Law Research Paper No. 2014-28

Number of pages: 82 Posted: 14 Oct 2014 Last Revised: 09 Feb 2016

John R. Allison, Mark A. Lemley and David L. Schwartz

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Stanford Law School and Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law

Downloads 709 (38,844)

Abstract:

12.

How Federal Circuit Judges Vote in Patent Validity Cases

Florida State Univeristy Law Review, Vol. 29, p. 745, 2000

Number of pages: 24 Posted: 29 Nov 1999

John R. Allison and Mark A. Lemley

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Stanford Law School

Downloads 645 (44,090)

Citation 1

Abstract:

13.

How Often Do Non-Practicing Entities Win Patent Suits?

32 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 235 (2017), Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 485, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2750128, Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 16-08, Northwestern Law & Econ Research Paper No. 16-03

Number of pages: 74 Posted: 20 Mar 2016 Last Revised: 17 Apr 2020

John R. Allison, Mark A. Lemley and David L. Schwartz

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Stanford Law School and Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law

Downloads 612 (47,232)

Citation 2

Abstract:

14.

University Software Ownership and Litigation: A First Examination

Duke Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 160, Duke Science, Technology & Innovation Paper No. 20

Number of pages: 52 Posted: 26 Jun 2007 Last Revised: 14 May 2014

Arti K. Rai, John R. Allison and Bhaven N. Sampat

Duke University School of Law, University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Columbia University - Mailman School of Public Health

Downloads 573 (51,467)

Citation 3

Abstract:

15.

On the Feasibility of Improving Patent Quality One Technology at a Time: The Case of Business Methods

MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 4564-05, McCombs Research Paper Series No. IROM-06-05

Number of pages: 64 Posted: 11 Oct 2005

John R. Allison and Starling David Hunter

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Carnegie Mellon University

Downloads 366 (88,735)

Citation 13

Abstract:

16.

The Disputed Quality of Software Patents

U of Texas Law, Law and Econ Research Paper No. 97

Number of pages: 58 Posted: 15 Mar 2007 Last Revised: 14 May 2014

John R. Allison and Ronald J. Mann

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Columbia University - Law School

Downloads 363 (89,557)

Citation 8

Abstract:

17.

Software Patents, Incumbents, and Entry

Texas Law Review, Vol. 85, No. 7, June 2007, U of Texas Law, Law and Econ Research Paper No. 105

Number of pages: 48 Posted: 30 May 2007

John R. Allison, Abe Dunn and Ronald J. Mann

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, affiliation not provided to SSRN and Columbia University - Law School

Downloads 351 (93,074)

Abstract:

18.

Valuable Patents Redux: On the Enduring Merit of Using Patent Characteristics to Identify Valuable Patents

Texas Law Review, Vol. 85, p. 1769, 2007

Number of pages: 29 Posted: 06 Jun 2007

John R. Allison and Thomas W. Sager

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and University of Texas at Austin - Red McCombs School of Business

Downloads 349 (93,697)

Citation 1

Abstract:

19.

Patents and Business Models for Software Firms

U of Texas Law, Law and Econ Research Paper No. 77

Number of pages: 39 Posted: 11 Apr 2006

John R. Allison, Abe Dunn and Ronald J. Mann

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin - Department of Economics and Columbia University - Law School

Downloads 345 (94,902)

Citation 1

Abstract:

20.

How Courts Adjudicate Patent Definiteness and Disclosure

Duke Law Journal, Vol. 65, p. 609, 2016

Number of pages: 87 Posted: 21 Mar 2015 Last Revised: 13 Jan 2016

John R. Allison and Lisa Larrimore Ouellette

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Stanford Law School

Downloads 297 (111,903)

Abstract:

21.

Patent Litigation and the Internet

Downloads 257 (130,317)

Citation 4

2

Patent Litigation and the Internet

Number of pages: 62 Posted: 22 Jan 2012

John R. Allison, Emerson H. Tiller and Samantha Zyontz

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law and Stanford Law School

Downloads 151 (212,542)

Citation 4

Abstract:

Patent Litigation and the Internet

Stanford Technology Law Review, Vol. 3, 2012

Number of pages: 35 Posted: 10 Aug 2012

John R. Allison, Emerson H. Tiller, Samantha Zyontz and Tristian Bligh

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law, Stanford Law School and affiliation not provided to SSRN

Downloads 106 (279,020)

Abstract:

22.

Patent Value

Forthcoming in RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON THE ECONOMICS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, VOLUME II (Peter Menell & David Schwartz eds. 2018).

Number of pages: 51 Posted: 27 Jul 2018

John R. Allison

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business

Downloads 116 (260,382)

John R. Allison

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business

Spence Centennial Professor

22

Top 1,116

25,611

Top 5,657

45

166

Scholarly Papers (22)

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract: