Author Page for John R. Allison

Indiana University Maurer School of Law, University of San Diego School of Law, University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, University of Minnesota Law School, University of Richmond - School of Law, George Washington University - Law School, UC Law, San Francisco, University of Iowa - College of Law, Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law and West Virginia University College of Law

Downloads 3,206 (8,006)

Abstract:

4.

Understanding the Realities of Modern Patent Litigation

92 Texas Law Review 1769 (2014), Chicago-Kent College of Law Research Paper No. 2014-12, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2442451

Number of pages: 33 Posted: 28 May 2014 Last Revised: 07 Oct 2014

John R. Allison, Mark A. Lemley and David L. Schwartz

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Stanford Law School and Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law

Downloads 2,489 (11,948)

Citation 6

Abstract:

5.

Patent Quality and Settlement among Repeat Patent Litigants

Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 398, 99 Georgetown Law Journal 677 (2011)

Number of pages: 31 Posted: 20 Sep 2010 Last Revised: 28 Apr 2020

John R. Allison, Joshua H. Walker and Mark A. Lemley

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP and Stanford Law School

Downloads 2,451 (12,208)

Citation 34

Abstract:

6.

Who's Patenting What? An Empirical Exploration of Patent Prosecution

Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 53, p. 2099, 2000, UC Berkeley, Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 19, University of Texas Public Law & Legal Theory, Research Paper No. 010

Number of pages: 81 Posted: 13 Jun 2000

John R. Allison and Mark A. Lemley

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Stanford Law School

Downloads 1,660 (22,709)

Citation 25

Abstract:

7.

Extreme Value or Trolls on Top? The Characteristics of the Most Litigated Patents

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 158, No. 1, December 2009, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1407796

Number of pages: 37 Posted: 21 May 2009 Last Revised: 30 Sep 2012

John R. Allison, Mark A. Lemley and Joshua H. Walker

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Stanford Law School and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP

Downloads 1,463 (27,439)

Citation 7

Abstract:

8.

The (Unnoticed) Demise of the Doctrine of Equivalents

59 Stanford Law Review 955 (2007)

Number of pages: 31 Posted: 12 Jan 2007 Last Revised: 30 Apr 2020

John R. Allison and Mark A. Lemley

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Stanford Law School

Downloads 1,139 (39,564)

Abstract:

9.

The Business Method Patent Myth

Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 18, Fall 2003

Number of pages: 93 Posted: 28 Jul 2003

John R. Allison and Emerson H. Tiller

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law

Downloads 1,098 (41,786)

Citation 13

Abstract:

10.

The Growing Complexity of the United States Patent System

Boston University Law Review, Vol. 82, p. 77, 2002

Number of pages: 85 Posted: 08 Sep 2001

John R. Allison and Mark A. Lemley

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Stanford Law School

Downloads 1,087 (42,393)

Citation 5

Abstract:

11.

Our Divided Patent System

University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 82, pp. 1073-1154 (2015), Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2510004, Chicago-Kent College of Law Research Paper No. 2014-28

Number of pages: 82 Posted: 14 Oct 2014 Last Revised: 09 Feb 2016

John R. Allison, Mark A. Lemley and David L. Schwartz

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Stanford Law School and Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law

Downloads 920 (53,515)

Citation 3

Abstract:

12.

The Evolution of Chinese Attitudes Toward Property Rights in Invention and Discovery

Number of pages: 68 Posted: 20 Apr 2000

John R. Allison and Lianlian Lin

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Downloads 868 (57,955)

Citation 3

Abstract:

13.

How Often Do Non-Practicing Entities Win Patent Suits?

32 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 235 (2017), Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 485, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2750128, Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 16-08, Northwestern Law & Econ Research Paper No. 16-03

Number of pages: 74 Posted: 20 Mar 2016 Last Revised: 17 Apr 2020

John R. Allison, Mark A. Lemley and David L. Schwartz

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Stanford Law School and Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law

Downloads 721 (74,252)

Citation 6

Abstract:

14.

How Federal Circuit Judges Vote in Patent Validity Cases

Florida State Univeristy Law Review, Vol. 29, p. 745, 2000

Number of pages: 24 Posted: 29 Nov 1999

John R. Allison and Mark A. Lemley

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Stanford Law School

Downloads 695 (77,809)

Citation 1

Abstract:

15.

University Software Ownership and Litigation: A First Examination

Duke Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 160, Duke Science, Technology & Innovation Paper No. 20

Number of pages: 52 Posted: 26 Jun 2007 Last Revised: 14 May 2014

Arti K. Rai, John R. Allison and Bhaven N. Sampat

Duke University School of Law, University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Columbia University - Mailman School of Public Health

Downloads 613 (91,266)

Citation 3

Abstract:

16.

On the Feasibility of Improving Patent Quality One Technology at a Time: The Case of Business Methods

MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 4564-05, McCombs Research Paper Series No. IROM-06-05

Number of pages: 64 Posted: 11 Oct 2005

John R. Allison and Starling David Hunter

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Carnegie Mellon University

Downloads 476 (124,801)

Citation 12

Abstract:

17.

Valuable Patents Redux: On the Enduring Merit of Using Patent Characteristics to Identify Valuable Patents

Texas Law Review, Vol. 85, p. 1769, 2007

Number of pages: 29 Posted: 06 Jun 2007

John R. Allison and Thomas W. Sager

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and University of Texas at Austin - McCombs School of Business

Downloads 445 (135,300)

Citation 1

Abstract:

18.

The Disputed Quality of Software Patents

U of Texas Law, Law and Econ Research Paper No. 97

Number of pages: 58 Posted: 15 Mar 2007 Last Revised: 14 May 2014

John R. Allison and Ronald J. Mann

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Columbia University - Law School

Downloads 437 (138,310)

Citation 8

Abstract:

19.

How Courts Adjudicate Patent Definiteness and Disclosure

Duke Law Journal, Vol. 65, p. 609, 2016

Number of pages: 87 Posted: 21 Mar 2015 Last Revised: 13 Jan 2016

John R. Allison and Lisa Larrimore Ouellette

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Stanford Law School

Downloads 402 (152,244)

Abstract:

20.

Software Patents, Incumbents, and Entry

Texas Law Review, Vol. 85, No. 7, June 2007, U of Texas Law, Law and Econ Research Paper No. 105

Number of pages: 48 Posted: 30 May 2007

John R. Allison, Abe Dunn and Ronald J. Mann

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, affiliation not provided to SSRN and Columbia University - Law School

Downloads 385 (159,736)

Abstract:

21.

Patent Litigation and the Internet

Downloads 382 (161,186)

Citation 4

2

Patent Litigation and the Internet

Number of pages: 62 Posted: 22 Jan 2012

John R. Allison, Emerson H. Tiller and Samantha Zyontz

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law and Boston University - Questrom School of Business

Downloads 249 (251,892)

Citation 4

Abstract:

Patent Litigation and the Internet

Stanford Technology Law Review, Vol. 3, 2012

Number of pages: 35 Posted: 10 Aug 2012

John R. Allison, Emerson H. Tiller, Samantha Zyontz and Tristian Bligh

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law, Boston University - Questrom School of Business and affiliation not provided to SSRN

Downloads 133 (444,092)

Abstract:

22.

Patents and Business Models for Software Firms

U of Texas Law, Law and Econ Research Paper No. 77

Number of pages: 39 Posted: 11 Apr 2006

John R. Allison, Abe Dunn and Ronald J. Mann

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin - Department of Economics and Columbia University - Law School

Downloads 378 (163,083)

Citation 1

Abstract:

23.

Patent Value

Forthcoming in RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON THE ECONOMICS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, VOLUME II (Peter Menell & David Schwartz eds. 2018).

Number of pages: 51 Posted: 27 Jul 2018

John R. Allison

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business

Downloads 190 (327,532)

Abstract:

24.

Patent Law: An Open-Source Casebook (Cover, Preface, and Table of Contents)

Patent Law: An Open-Source Casebook (Fall 2023)

Number of pages: 17 Posted: 30 Apr 2021 Last Revised: 27 Aug 2023

John R. Allison, Thomas F. Cotter, Christopher Anthony Cotropia, Mark D. Janis, Dmitry Karshtedt, Jeffrey A. Lefstin, Jason Rantanen, Ted M. Sichelman, David O. Taylor and S. Sean Tu

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, University of Minnesota Law School, University of Richmond - School of Law, Indiana University Maurer School of Law, George Washington University - Law School, UC Law, San Francisco, University of Iowa - College of Law, University of San Diego School of Law, Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law and West Virginia University College of Law

Downloads 157 (387,381)

Citation 1

Abstract:

25.

Patent Law: An Open-Source Casebook (Chapter 4: Disclosure)

Patent Law: An Open-Source Casebook (Fall 2023)

Number of pages: 89 Posted: 26 Apr 2021 Last Revised: 27 Aug 2023

John R. Allison, Mark D. Janis and Ted M. Sichelman

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Indiana University Maurer School of Law and University of San Diego School of Law

Downloads 75 (650,452)

John R. Allison

University of Texas - McCombs School of Business

Spence Centennial Professor

25

Top 1,836

33,220

Top 7,347

205

Scholarly Papers (25)

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract: